![]() We don't all complain about the release of a new product, we complain about the total absence of development to improve a product that many people have purchased no more than a year ago. Here is why in any post related to Ronin-SC there are people who complain about the policy adopted by the DJI. Yes you are right, we must give time to answer, but I just want to inform you that it is from Mathat we are waiting for answers in the release of a new firmware, the output of the Ronin-SC, independently from Pload, represented a real offense for all those who bought the Ronin-S, a serious company would have brought out an update for Ronnin-s first and soon after it would have cried out the release of his younger brother Ronin-SC. They will respond but maybe not personally as many are asking the same things. They have released it for lighter cameras. I was told Ronin A would be overkill as Rx10 is only half payload of SC. I was going to get the Ronin S but will be getting the SC as it's more suitable for the Rx10 IV. Give them time to respond, and I'm sure they are aware and doing something. ![]() DJI I address you directly, if you really have common sense and really believe in your customers do something for all Ronin-S owners, this attitude you are taking and the lack of professionalism you are showing you do not like, you have hundreds and hundreds of unsatisfied customers and confused by your policy, change course. Hi everyone, all customers who have purchased the Ronin-S do not express their disappointment, it is shameful that DJi itself produces a wider and more complete list of the Ronin-SC than Ronin-s, it is also disappointing that none of the DJs answer the countless questions addressed to him. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |